Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Pac-10 Representation in the NBA

In case none of you beloved readers knows how many Pac-10 players there are in the league, or what team they play for, I am here to help. Earlier this evening, I was pointed to a web site that has a list of all college alumni currently playing in the NBA. With that, I have decided to put together that information in a nice little list for your convenience:

Note: Special thanks to CBS Sports for this, it's amazing!!!

Arizona:
ASU:
Cal:
Oregon:
OSU:
Stanford:
UCLA:
U$C:
Washington:
WSU:

Here they are in order of most to least players:

UCLA - 14

Arizona -11

Stanford - 6

Cal/Oregon/U$C - 5 (each)

ASU/Washington - 4 (each)

WSU - 1


OSU - 0

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Most Historically Overrated "Basketball Schools"

I am sure anyone who reads this blog has heard the term "basketball school" before but I shall reiterate what it means. It means that the school is traditionally successful in basketball (as opposed to football). But what does successful really mean? Making a sweet-16? Final Four? Winning a national championship? If you ask UCLA folk, they tell you the latter. If you ask folks in the state of North Carolina, Kentucky, or Indiana they will say the latter two. With that, it is sad that some schools get the title of a basketball school basically because they have a horrible football team and a basketball winning tradition that rivals the quality of a Snoop Dogg movie. It is honestly really annoying when some schools claim greatness (or anything remotely close to it) only because they have terrible football history and a couple nice basketball moments. To let my frustrations air out, I have decided to compile a list of the top-5 schools who are only basketball schools by default and not because they actually deserve it. This is ought to piss off some fanbases, but the numbers don't lie.

NOTE: THE SCHOOLS CONSIDERED ARE THOSE WHO HAVE THE RESOURCES AND HAVE BEEN THE TALK NATIONALLY HAVE A REPUTATION.

5. Villanova: They only won one title and that came in 1985. They have reached the final four four times (including last year). Not a bad resume and nearly identical to the honorable mentions but they have far less success in their own conference when compared to the Big East teams that I put as honorable mentions.

4. UNLV: They have similar numbers to a lot of other schools that are honorable mentions (and the previous spot) but they come from a conference that is not one of the Big 6. They made all four of their final fours under the same coach (including their national title) and have been accused of some shady business in the early 90's when they were most successful.

3. Maryland: They won their lone national championship in 2002. They have two final four appearances (in 2001 and 2002). Otherwise, they do not have too much nationally. Sure they have 22 seasons of 20+ wins, and have made 5 elite-8's but that's not too great. They do not have the top spot because they won at a time where Duke was dominating nationally as well as the ACC and so they had to overcome that shadow when they finally won.

2. Stanford: The basically have the same numbers as Maryland but... they last won a national championship in 1942. They last made a final four in 1998 and the only other time they got there was when they won in 1942. Yes, they have had a lot of success in the late 90's in the conference but when their performances on the national stage are pretty infrequent.


1. Memphis: Umm... Three final four appearances, two of which were vacated by the NCAA. No NCAA titles. Those are some ugly facts. Congrats to Memphis for finally being #1 in a national discussion of college basketball!

Honorable mentions: Arizona, Georgetown, and Syracuse.

Pac-10 Weekend Recap

As I have been for the last few weeks, I am going to recap what's happened in the Pac-10 this past weekend and how it has shaped the conference for the near future. Once again, there is tons and tons of parity and unpredictability. It should be no surprise really that only one game separates the team at the top (Cal) and five other teams who are at 4-3 in conference play. There are two teams sitting at 2-5 in conference that actually were not too bad going into the conference season, and both happen to be from the same state.
Now as usual, it is time to delineate a list of the significant things and changes that occurred on Thursday and Saturday in the West Coast best (historically) conference:

1. Cal is not as bad as I thought. They are sitting at the top of the conference, and have recovered quite well after their choke job against UCLA and destruction at the hands of Washington. Sure it was against the cellar-dwellers of the conference, but a win is a win, and two wins is even better. Hopefully next week I won't have to write a paragraph about how Cal is really bad again, but we'll see.

2. Washington sucks. The literally cannot play well on the road. They first lose a heart breaker against the Bruins on a buzzer beater and then just get straight up destroyed against U$C. They have now lost five games on the road and will probably end up in the NIT unless they win the conference tournament. But then again, the conference is in Los Angeles, not in the friendly confines of Bank of America Arena in Seattle.

3. The Los Angeles schools are for real. UCLA came back from an embarrassing loss of historic proportions last week against the crosstown cheaters and swept the Washington schools. U$C did lose at home to Wazzu, but came back and completely destroyed Washington. With nothing to play for except pride, look for U$C to make noise in the conference and effect the seeding of the teams for the tournament.

4. Arizona is back on top in its own state. The last couple of years there was a clear shift of powers towards the team from Tempe, but this year the shift is back towards Tucson. Arizona beat it's in-state rival in impressive fashion and have the same conference record.

5. Oregon schools in basketball seem like the opposite of their football counterparts. The Civil War this year was to determine who wins the conference and goes on to the Rose Bowl. In basketball? Well, they both sit at the bottom of the conference and things are not looking rosy at all. Things could change when they get the bi-polar acting LA schools at home this week, but chances are not too high for that.

Friday, January 22, 2010

Rush the court? Always.

It's time for me to put in my two cents on this developing debate on when rushing the court is appropriate. I am going to come out in an extremist position and say that rushing the court is OK whenever it occurs. That's right. When the students want to rush, I say rush the court and mob it like crazy.

Here's why. There is something unique about the college game, irregardless of sports. Unlike professional sport clubs who represent the people of a certain city/region who share certain characteristics and common life experiences, college sports represent a university comprised of students of all diverse backgrounds. Despite the diversity, students have one thing in common to offer the college game - their youth and energy. College sports can be at times far more emotionally invested than professional sports, as it is not only your team but for four wonderful years, it's represents your life. As a student, your campus is your world for four years. You eat, sleep, go to class, make friends, and transition into full adulthood among the buildings and quads of your campus. There are so many things that happen to you at college that there is no doubt that most students feel strong emotional ties to their campus. If not the campus or university itself, then at least strong emotional ties to the period in life that college encompasses.

Athletics offers an opportunity for your school to be represented on national television, carrying your personal emotions on some level to the field. We trust in our athletes to represent us in the best way they can and hope that they can prove on the field just how great the school is. I am not saying there aren't emotional victories in professional sports - there are. I just feel that the emotional uprisings created by professional sports are not the same uprisings felt at the college game. The emotion that students unleash is youthful, hopeful, and unbridled.

We at UCLA don't get to rush the field at the Rosebowl. That is one of the most unfortunate things about UCLA. I was fortunate enough to be in marching band on 13-9 (Dec 2, 2006). I was allowed to storm the field after upsetting the giant across town. The students were held back with tear gas and riot squad gear (I was also teargassed, even though I was allowed to be on the field, a story for another time). I can't describe the rush I got, being able to run on America's most celebrated sporting arena after upsetting USC. The only thing I regret is that the thousands of students behind me weren't able to join me. I would have wanted nothing more to make Sportcenter's Top 10 list, and top it number one. Imagine how good that looks for UCLA. Not that we need any more reasons to convince students to come here.

You don't go to a Chargers game and storm the field after a victory. Hell, you can't storm the field even if your team wins the Superbowl. You can rush the field in college. You can storm the court. That in itself is a unique element of college sports, which is an embodiment of the experiences I tried to explain above. I don't feel that we should be storming the court regularly. But I don't think there should be rules as to when we should and shouldn't. I don't care if its a ranked opponent or not. I feel that the beauty of the college game is embodied in a spontaneous burst of emotion that compels one to storm the court. That energy should never be curtailed or held back.

-RJWI

Rush the Court? Sometimes, Not Always

As a response to the blog post by our newest writer Scott (welcome Scott), I am here to give my own opinion as to when rushing the court is acceptable at the esteemed institution that is UCLA. Let me begin by saying that yesterday, from my view in the band, I wish I could run courtside and high-five Mustafa for his amazing game winner against those Huskies. But I couldn't. I think that we all got swept up in the dramatic way that the game ended and did not think too much. I was there next to two of my two best friends in the band who are also seniors and have seen the glory days of the last few years. All three of us were high-fiving and jumping up and down (and screaming) with joy. We lived the moment, not the past. That is until I mentioned to them, "hey, this is as good as the finish against Cal (and Stanford) from sophomore year!"
We discussed how this is completely different and more epic because two years ago, we were expected to win, if not dominate every game. So sure, why not let those great feelings of years past come back to us upperclassmen or let the freshmen celebrate a great (well it's Washington...) win at home? Here's why. No matter how bad the team might be this year, those four letters on the chest of the players symbolize what has come before them (or in the case of the seniors, their time) and the rich tradition it stands for. Yes, we should not be pompous and elitist but UCLA is still the class of college basketball (maybe not by how fans show up to games) and it will be until anyone can even come close to the magical number, 11.

Like UCLA, there are other schools rich in tradition. When those schools come to Pauley Pavilion and are ranked higher than UCLA, there should be a reason to rush the court. But let me restate it, ONLY if they are RANKED HIGHER! Otherwise there is no legitimate excuse for the student section to ever rush the court. Now you might ask who might those schools be? Here is a list I, along with my roommates a few weeks ago, came up with (in no particular order):
1. Kentucky
2. UNC
3. Duke
4. Kansas
5. Indiana
To us those seemed like the only schools who have enough name-brand and rich tradition that in the somewhat rare case (like this year with Kansas) of them coming to Westwood with a higher ranking that we should rush the court. There are a few other schools that maybe deserve some consideration such as Georgetown, Syracuse, UConn, Michigan, and Michigan State. In fact, I would maybe only consider UConn and MSU but just wanted to suggest a couple other schools who I respect for what they have done.

Rush the court? Yes we will!

As a UCLA student, I felt obligated to reply to the criticisms for tonight's attempted rushing of the court. While many have called it pathetic, I too found the Den (and UCLA fans in general) to be pathetic but for far different reasons than you (which I shall address at the end of this rant).

The first thing I wanted to address was your pre-game attitude of fans. Many fans including myself (which is shown by the decrease of average attendance this year by 2,000 -i read this statistic i hope it's not true-), have expressed loss of all interest in the Bruins this season. Many people have lost all interest in this team as for ever glimmer of hope they show, they follow it up with a truck-load of disappointment. The feelign going into this game was that even if we squeaked out a win, we'd become embarrassed by Washington State and the Oregon teams. So what's the point?

Would an ordinary UCLA team follow up a win with embarrassing losses? No. Would this team? Yes, this team normally would. They are a team that is an embarassment to John Wooden and UCLA basketball. This has been the team that fell way short of our justified expectations of tournament wins. We were quick to shun this team and it showed. Fan attendance has been lackluster at best as I was able to get floor seats for these games in the student sections mere hours before the game, while in past years camping out was a necessity. This team is not your UCLA basketball team. This is a team of young, immature playeres who have not met the more than colossal expectations, and had no motivation is sight.

Ben Howland certainly wasn't providing motivation. Ben Howland is not a player's coach. There's no way around this fact. He preaches defense, but on the sideline you don't see much emotion. This is not the coach a team rallies around. Indeed, Howland played zone nearly all game showing all loss on his principles. While this is necessary for our skill-set, giving up on the trademark of his coaching certainly had to have some players losing some faith in his coaching. This team is starving for some form of motivation. In past wins they followed it up by losses since there waas no motivation. They were playing at a winner's school, where their minor victories were not met by congratulations but attidues like "its about time" and "they better not embarass us again." They were more rather scared of failure at an institute that condemns anything but perfection.

Therefore, the Washington game provided the attitude this team needs to thrive. This is not a team that will meet UCLA expectations. If you're worried about national expectations that's a joke. We have our reputation, it won't die over one season. We need to start focusing on this season. We have become the underdog team. We're not that team anymore that teams come to play saying "this is UCLA, they are proven, we better come out and show it." They are now the team of undercoached, overvalued youngsters who haven't done anything but disappoint.

This point brings me to tonight's attempted rush of the court. Coming into college I thought the only way UCLA would ever rush the court was a perfect season. Today changed that. Sure it was embarrassing. Sure it would seem terrible to see on Sportscenter: "UCLA rushes courts against unranked opponent." Its embarrassing. Its juvenile. And it's exactly what this team needs. We must drop this pompous, elite attitude. We're not a superpower this year and we gotta stop acting like it. Fans aren't coming to games since they expect perfection and they're not getting it this year. But we're an underdog team that can bring the exciting game (Cal and Washington) and that's what the fans should be expecting to see. Even though we failed to rush the court, it was exactly what we needed. Some of us (including myself) made it to midcourt. While we were shortly ushered off, the players certainly took note. I have never seen more energized players. Reeves Nelson let out a tremendous yell and Lee and Honeycutt were high fiving everyone. Don't say "These are the young players who have yet to understand our tradition". Roll was more amped up than anyone. This is what this team needs. If you don't want to be disappointed vs. Wash St (or the future), the team needs this encourage. They can no longer be thought of the "let-down team" but rather "the underdog team". We'll rush the court. We'll take it as an accomplishment. We'll win the games. Not as much as we should, but this team needs to take on a new identity.

Which brings me to my final point about the Den being pathetic. There was no reason we should not of rushed the court. The security guard were not intent on stopping us, they were doing only their duty (holding up their arms) and the LA fans got scared. While I know you are going call me out on breaking the law, but cops are obligated to do this. Ask any college basketball fan who has rushed a court (and do not bring up the USC-UCLA argument, Rose Bowl is completely different, we do not own that stadium so cops can pepper spray us, that would not do that to their own student at Pauley). You gotta take the step and run past those guards. Rushing the court is about claiming the court as ours. And that's what we needed. LA fans lack the enthusiasm needed. I have been to every football and basketball game and it has shown throughout. It showed during football season (half the stadium was empty for our bowl clinching win) and it has been half-empty this basketball seaason. Its embarrassing. That being said, if we could have pulled off the rush, imagine the clip on sportcenter. It would be what our players and fans needed. Think of any rushing the court clip, the riot in the middle of the courts, fans celebrating with athletes. Now forget history, if fans see that on the tv do you not think they will be pumped up to go to future games? What's better? Seeing the win and then seeing our record (8-10) and thinking we suck? Or seeing the win and the celebration and thinking "this is a team i wanna see." If this team saw a chaotic celebration do you not think they would be amped up knowing their fan base loves them?

We were the number one play on espn and our crowd needs to get behind this team. They are not our past teams but they are today's team. Never forget our history. We are UCLA. We are championship. But this team is not at the level so we have to meet them halfway. Our expectations are too high, we are an underdog team and we gotta feed that identity.

Sorry to offend any fans, but being in the heart of the den then hearing the criticism set me off. Celebrate with the team. Our reputation will stay in place and if we want more respect, we need to start winning. Some of the point may seem exaggerated, but I hope the point reaches home. Drop the attitude of expecting championships for right now. At least for this season. These players need that.